Back-to-Back Illustrations

I recently had a run of three illustrations published within one week. That used to be fairly standard for my job back in the 2000s and early 2010s, but such a flurry of artistic work is a rarity now. I was happy to do it, but also relieved to find that the effort didn’t stress me overmuch. It is good to know that I can still comfortably ratchet up to the pace of the olden days; I felt good about that. I’m showing two of the drawings here since they go together!

Two illustrations for the 2024 Mercury News coverage of the annual Silicon Valley Poll

The newspaper, in partnership with a regional studies organization, conducts an annual public opinion survey in the Bay Area and — looking at it selfishly — it is usually good fodder for illustration opportunities. The poll typically generates three or four days of stories based on the analysis of the survey data. This year I committed to two illustrations running on back to back days. 

I prefer to work on one assignment at a time but I had to cultivate both illustrations in tandem because I mistakenly thought my Day 2 effort was for Day 1 – my bad. So I had to adjust course to make sure that I had the right one done first. I managed to get them both finished before the weekend so the only speed bump of consequence encountered was a mental one. Whew.


This is how the illustrations appeared in print.

The rough sketches


The illustration for ‘Day 1’ pertained to economic hardship, the expense of living here and the housing crisis. As is often the case for illustration assignments, the story and the illustration are developed at the same time, and one must hope that during the reporting and writing the story doesn’t reveal itself to have a different focal point than the one we anticipated. That did not happen in this case — there was the benefit seeing the poll data as a guide for the main interests of the story — but I tried to represent homelessness and the cost of housing in a general sense to hopefully cover any possible variation on the theme.


I swiped a house pic from the internet to avoid spending the time 

drawing one to sell the idea if it was just going to be rejected.

The robot illustration didn’t stray much from the accepted rough. I selfied for reference!


The illo for ‘Day 2’ is meant to speak to our fear of the rise technocracy, its diabolical impact on our society and the soul-crushing potential of Artificial Intelligence to disrupt the lives of the common man, the common worker… the common newspaper illustrator. Yeah, I’m feeling it.


‘Day 2,’ as the 'Day 1' illustration, is also conceptually basic; it’s the simple “fear of the future as a robot” cliche that we should all try to stay away from, although it’s about the 100th time I’ve used it. But it’s the idea that got through the approval gauntlet and, contrarily, I absolutely enjoy the cliche! After all, my childhood dream was to be one of those guys who sketched the robot illustrations for the Fred Saberhagen stories in Galaxy Magazine. As I walk and talk and opine in the world of adults, I raise my nose and dismiss the banal predictability of such a hackneyed concept. But at my core I am ecstatic. "Destroy all humans," I whisper.


That's all for this time! Everything was drawn in ClipStudio for iPad.


the end

A Surprising Illustration

I work for the Mercury News/East Bay Times family of newspapers, and late one morning back in April, I was asked to make a quick illustration for a story about the Oakland Athletics and the team’s potential move to Las Vegas. And as I recall, the story also touched upon the likely inequity of the deals that could be given by cash-strapped Oakland and La$ Vega$ respectively.

This is the final art as drawn in ClipStudio on the iPad.


It had to be a quick turnaround because it was a same-day assignment. We had a brief discussion to come up with an idea and then I sketched the rough, creating my own cartoon interpretation of the A’s mascot, Stomper the elephant.


This is the initial rough. I like the washers, peanuts and comb on the table, symbolic of Oakland's offer being comparable to whatever it is they might have in their pockets! Probably discarded that idea because it might not be a clear message.


It was then vetted and approved. From the get-go the drawing was leaning too far toward being “cute” for my liking but there wasn’t much time to course-correct. And I may have given in to my cheesy inclinations and hammed it up. Obviously.


It was the Sports Page after all, right? It had been a while since I had done a light-hearted illustration for sports, but it wasn’t boldly inappropriate to put a some silliness onto that section front. So i went with it.


I shipped it to the page designer ahead of the deadline — felt pretty good about that — and finished up my shift. Whew.


As it appeared on the front page.
Yikes!

The next morning, before work, I went out for groceries. Imagine my surprise – imagine my loud wheezing gasp when I saw the paper on the news rack. And right there, on the front page — not inside on the sports section but on the A1 front page — was my cute drawing. Ugh!


A1 is prime real estate, the work is the main display on the rack and online for the world. It’s considered a big deal. I’ve done a lot of front-page illustrations over the decades but i’m pretty sure this was the first instance where I was not aware of that fact beforehand.


Although I approach all of my assignments with the same commitment, A1 elicits, for me, a stronger sense of wanting to better represent the work my art is calling attention to.


If I had known would I have done something differently? I shrug and say I don’t know. Maybe I wouldn’t have made his eyes so big, his cheeks so shiny; perhaps I would have muzzled the cute.


Looking at it now I feel like I may have gotten away with something cheeky without aiming to.